bet9ja.com
Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?
By Natalie Sherman
bet9ja.com
Business press reporter, New york city
A restriction on sports betting in most US states could be reversed by a case being considered by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 that mostly banned sports betting, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" concern.
The case, which started on Monday, follows New Jersey homeowners enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting.
A group of sports betting leagues opposes wagering on video games, which they fear will motivate match-fixing.
Lower courts have actually regularly ruled versus New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to restrict a state's policy choices.
The Supreme Court chose to hear the case nevertheless in the middle of a wider shift in American attitudes toward sports betting.
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal gambling establishments outside Native American lands.
But in the last few years, states hungry for tax revenue in the wake of the financial crash have actually enacted a rash of looser sports betting laws, gathering substantial levies on sports betting revenue.
There are now 24 states with business casinos - roughly double the number a years ago.
Despite the official ban, which already exempts Nevada and 3 other states, illegal sports betting is rife in the US.
Americans put about $154bn in illegal sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, described the federal restriction, external as an "utter failure" earlier this year.
It says the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting is commonplace.
"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of crucial tax earnings and permit them to reap the rewards of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.
More than 15 states filed documents in support of New Jersey in the event. A handful have actually already passed laws to authorise sports betting in case of a modification.
'Times have altered'
On Monday, as legal representatives began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
The court is expected to decide in June 2018.
"If we are effective here we could have bets being taken in New Jersey within two weeks of a decision by the court," said outgoing New Jersey governor Chris Christie after participating in the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're all set to go."
Despite the court's last judgment, Congress might likewise take up the dispute amid broader discussion about online video gaming and e-sports betting.
Even a few of the expert sports betting leagues have actually started to alter their positions on the concern of sports betting.
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would develop an uniform set of rules across the US. "Times have actually changed," he composed in a 2014 viewpoint piece, external.
Addicts struggling with mobile sports betting
3 October 2017
bet9ja.com
The tricky issue of issue gambling
31 August 2017
bit.ly
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the United States Sports Betting Ban?
Celsa Clouse edited this page 2 weeks ago